| Welcome Guest. |
| Lost Password? |
| No account yet? Register |
General Discussion : Break Open Your Head (0) by Gundar Veebor - July 23, 2008, 07:53:08 AM
Heart of Alberta Content : New 7 wonders galler... (0) by Admin - July 10, 2008, 11:32:42 AM
General Discussion : Talk vs. appeasement (0) by Posy - May 16, 2008, 10:42:20 AM
General Discussion : The Empire Strikes B... (0) by Posy - May 08, 2008, 11:43:57 AM
General Discussion : Bill Maher greets th... (0) by hermetic - April 21, 2008, 01:12:09 PM
HoA General Discussion : Site mascot (13) by snouto - April 06, 2008, 05:16:38 PM
Heart of Alberta Content : Penguins April Fool ... (1) by snouto - April 03, 2008, 11:21:11 PM
Features
News
The Chris Walsh Journal
Alberta Election 2008 | Alberta Election 2008 |
|
|
|
| Written by Christopher Walsh | |
| Sunday, 10 February 2008 | |
|
I was having a cigarette with Battle River-Wainwright MLA Doug Griffiths on a dark September night in Castor last fall, when I first heard we'd all be going to the polls this month.
Doug was on some type
of rebellion truth-telling crusade and had just finished apologizing to
town council if they felt he had let them down over the last year. It
was a trying time, Griffiths explained, but he was over whatever
personal turmoil he had gone through earlier in 2007 and was back and
focused and ready for anything.
He
said a lot that night and his candor struck me as refreshing. It's one
of those nights for a reporter where you start to think, 'sweet Jesus,
there are good people in politics who aren't afraid to give their
straight opinion'. I've always valued that trait in people, but here
was a Tory MLA telling a group of awestruck town councillors that the
premier was wrong to go after Big Oil the way he did. It wouldn't be
effective, Griffiths told them, because foreign oil investors will pull
their money and move it someplace else.
Screw the oil companies and their threats of pulling out. That wouldn't happen, but the money behind them would go elsewhere and the drilling would slow down. Many of Griffith's constituents would lose their jobs and the province, in turn, a lot of it's potential future wealth. I followed him out of the council meeting, to ask him what he was doing.
Griffiths
has a certain charm that he uses well. It's the boyish smile followed
by a look of wisdom or a wink that lets you know you're in on the whole
shuck. But this wasn't a shuck, was it Doug?
“We
do have some tremendous infrastructure strains that need to be
addressed, but it's not all the oilpatch's responsibility,” I quoted
him as saying in the Castor Advance. “It's time both [the industry and
government] bore responsibility and both fixed [infrastructure
demands]. I think the oilpatch is open, I don't know if we've been
completely. I don't know if we've taken a serious look in the mirror to
see what we can do better too. I think it's time we do. Before we ask
the oilpatch for more money, we better get our game in shape.”
So
there it is. A Tory MLA standing outside the party ring and saying the
Leader didn't handle things the right way. This is rare in politics and
has resulted in Griffith's now continual occupancy of the Tory
doghouse. He first took up residence there in December of 2006 when his
man, Jim Dinning, failed to capture the leadership. He was the front
runner and the complete opposite of ultra-conservative Ted Morton, who
scared just about everybody with a conscience. In between was a little
guy named Ed Stelmach who captured enough second choice votes to propel
him into the premiership. When you look back on it, it is strange that
a man who was thought of as 'second choice' would now be governing the
richest province in the country. And there's a very strong contingent
in the Tory party that feel he's destroying the province. Mostly urban
dwellers though, and nobody who will actually tell you that over a
smoke....
Since
that December 2006 leadership run, Stelmach has done more than anyone
thought he could. He did address the royalty issue, whether his
decision fell short or went too far, he did address it. He also paid $2
billion to resolve the teacher's unfunded pension liability issue. He
should be able to count on their vote at least, (Christ that's a hell
of a deal for anyone when multiplied by everything else the teachers
got in the end. They shouldn't be complaining until five years are up
or they start actually educating people.) But it's Stelmach's demeanour
that bothers voting party members.
He's
not an eloquent speaker, he doesn't have that self-righteous gusto
Albertans took for granted before and he's actually trying to lead in
that quaint, small-town way in a province of over three million. There
are Tory strategists who must be scratching their heads. Why doesn't
the Alberta electorate love this man? Here he is, behold the pure-bred
Albertan male! And a thinking one at that. One who listens to all sides
and then makes up his mind. Shit, this man was reeve at one point, a
small town boy made good. So why, in “Alberta's second century”, as
Stelmach himself has called it, do the voters not get it?
Well,
the answer is as simple as the Albertan boy's claim. This is Alberta's
second century and a lot has changed. The rest of the country has moved
here. A country that has seen governments of all colours and political
stripes in every province across this nation. A country not as afraid
of change as some old-time folks here. It would take a colossal
failure, the likes of which have never been seen in the free world
before, to take this province down. So why is everybody afraid of
change?
That term has become
the unofficial Alberta 2008 campaign slogan. Stelmach himself is
selling something along the lines of 'change that works' and every
other party is running with it in simpler terms: Change. After 37
years, it's long overdue....
I've
spoken with candidates in three constituencies from all parties who
point out the political obvious: in any free and democratic society,
change is necessary. We have all learned this lesson federally and yet
here we are with a 37 year regime.
And
who's better off for it? That's what this election comes down to. The
Liberals, the NDPs, the Greens, the Wildrose Alliance, the SoCreds, and
the Tories will be trying to persuade every Albertan that a vote for
them will mean an even better way of life. Complacency and lack of
imagination have always been the major deterrent of change. How the
leaders will deal with that should make for an intriguing campaign......
Or maybe not. That's why most Albertans grow tired of campaigns. It's a pretty good life here, when you think about it, and why mess with a good thing? Well, there are cracks in the dynasty that are showing. No doctors, out of date sewer and water facilities, crumbling roads, no place to live, and a tremendous feeling of prosperity in spite of it all are the big issues. Let's see what happens.
I'll
be out traveling with the leaders in the coming weeks to get a sense of
their vision for the province and what they see as the biggest issues
facing people here. Things will get strange, people will crack, and the
rest will head to the polls March 3.
|
| < Prev |
|---|